Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Ibspinoff"
From YTMND
Roothorick (Talk | contribs) (unsigned comments, unmarked reply) |
Roothorick (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:This could be useable both if you need 1-4 spinoffs and 5+ spinoffs. Handy.{{unsigned|Smiddle}} | :This could be useable both if you need 1-4 spinoffs and 5+ spinoffs. Handy.{{unsigned|Smiddle}} | ||
:exactly, really handy for when you need less than 5 spinoff sites{{unsigned|Mikeycomicsinc}} | :exactly, really handy for when you need less than 5 spinoff sites{{unsigned|Mikeycomicsinc}} | ||
+ | :So modify [[Template:Fad infobox]] to hide unused spinoff bulletpoints (this is Mediawiki; see http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Parser_functions). And 5 is plenty. The objective is to give examples of good YTMNDs within the fad. Historically significant YTMNDs, whether on the list or not, whether qualifying for the list or not, should be linked to AND described (in case it is deleted) in the main article.[[User:Roothorick|Roothorick]] 05:29, January 27, 2009 (CST) |
Revision as of 05:29, January 27, 2009
its not that 5 is enough, its that 5 are too much. - Ollj
- This could be useable both if you need 1-4 spinoffs and 5+ spinoffs. Handy.--Unsigned comment, left by Smiddle
- exactly, really handy for when you need less than 5 spinoff sites--Unsigned comment, left by Mikeycomicsinc
- So modify Template:Fad infobox to hide unused spinoff bulletpoints (this is Mediawiki; see http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Parser_functions). And 5 is plenty. The objective is to give examples of good YTMNDs within the fad. Historically significant YTMNDs, whether on the list or not, whether qualifying for the list or not, should be linked to AND described (in case it is deleted) in the main article.Roothorick 05:29, January 27, 2009 (CST)