Difference between revisions of "User talk:Belgianrofliron"
(→you're awesome) |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Possibly, but don't edit the "Poland" wiki anymore, you don't know about the current trend enough to write a coherent article. Thank you for writing about the history of the original fad, which I will leave intact on the wiki, but that history no longer applies to the topic, as the sites are motivated by different reasons and are made in a very different way.<br> | Possibly, but don't edit the "Poland" wiki anymore, you don't know about the current trend enough to write a coherent article. Thank you for writing about the history of the original fad, which I will leave intact on the wiki, but that history no longer applies to the topic, as the sites are motivated by different reasons and are made in a very different way.<br> | ||
Also I agree entirely that wikipedia takes itself way too seriously, but that a wiki is perfect for a site that is less serious, just to get a bit of information spread around, not to be an empirical source on everything. | Also I agree entirely that wikipedia takes itself way too seriously, but that a wiki is perfect for a site that is less serious, just to get a bit of information spread around, not to be an empirical source on everything. | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | I suppose you responded about that last comment and I meant a wiki is perfect for a site such as YTMND, as it is less serious and pretentious. |
Revision as of 20:04, August 12, 2006
I'm awesome, discuss! Belgianrofliron 10:23, July 1, 2006 (CDT)
you're awesome
Possibly, but don't edit the "Poland" wiki anymore, you don't know about the current trend enough to write a coherent article. Thank you for writing about the history of the original fad, which I will leave intact on the wiki, but that history no longer applies to the topic, as the sites are motivated by different reasons and are made in a very different way.
Also I agree entirely that wikipedia takes itself way too seriously, but that a wiki is perfect for a site that is less serious, just to get a bit of information spread around, not to be an empirical source on everything.
I suppose you responded about that last comment and I meant a wiki is perfect for a site such as YTMND, as it is less serious and pretentious.