Difference between revisions of "Joke"
From YTMND
(this isn't NEDM ... check minus.) |
Westing1992 (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{Fad Infobox|name | |
| + | |img | ||
| + | |original=marc | ||
| + | |originalTitle=A Detailed Analysis of Prop. 23 | ||
| + | |orcreator=lacrossestar83 | ||
| + | |ordate=October 2, 2009 | ||
| + | |ordatecat=October 2009 | ||
| + | |spinoff1=hue | ||
| + | |title1=lacrossestar83 makes a site | ||
| + | |spinoff2=Idrewit | ||
| + | |title2=Draw Poland Day | ||
| + | |spinoff3=sydbarrettjoke | ||
| + | |title3=syd barrett joke | ||
| + | |spinoff4=clevelandisrioting | ||
| + | |title4=CLEVELAND IS RIOTING!!! | ||
| + | |spinoff5=libertarian | ||
| + | |title5=libertarian.ytmnd.com | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | The '''Joke''' fad is a [[Forced_fad]] by {{ytmnduser|lacrossestar83}}. The first site was made on October 2nd, 2009 and featured a deceptive title, a flashing image of the word "joke", and [[Ear_rape]]. This noise is composed of a [[Marv]] scream, a [[Most_Annoying_Sound_In_The_World]] scream, and various waveforms. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The fad has been repeated a couple hundred times with only slight variations in the audio. These sites generally receive low ratings, but there is a high degree of variability. For the exact same site, the rating might be anything from a low of a mid-1.0 to a high of a low-4.0. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Noise fads]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Trolling]] | ||
Revision as of 09:52, April 15, 2012
| Joke |
|---|
|
| Original YTMND: A Detailed Analysis of Prop. 23 |
| by lacrossestar83 |
| October 2, 2009 |
| Worthy spinoffs: |
The Joke fad is a Forced_fad by lacrossestar83. The first site was made on October 2nd, 2009 and featured a deceptive title, a flashing image of the word "joke", and Ear_rape. This noise is composed of a Marv scream, a Most_Annoying_Sound_In_The_World scream, and various waveforms.
The fad has been repeated a couple hundred times with only slight variations in the audio. These sites generally receive low ratings, but there is a high degree of variability. For the exact same site, the rating might be anything from a low of a mid-1.0 to a high of a low-4.0.
