ummmm we already have an article like this. see NARV --Rylasasin 19:10, February 3, 2007 (CST)
Sorry. Should it be left for deletion or should it just make reference to the NARV article?
yeah why nto make it refrence to the NARV article.--Rylasasin 19:47, February 3, 2007 (CST)