Difference between revisions of "Talk:Splitvoter"

From YTMND
Jump to: navigation, search
(Guilty)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
yeah why nto make it refrence to the NARV article.--[[User:Rylasasin|Rylasasin]] 19:47, February 3, 2007 (CST)
 
yeah why nto make it refrence to the NARV article.--[[User:Rylasasin|Rylasasin]] 19:47, February 3, 2007 (CST)
 +
 +
== Guilty ==
 +
 +
I'm guilty of this one. I tend to find things either really funny or piss-poor, although I have given credit for graphic work and effort. Is there a system to help "rehabilitate" my voting pattern? [[User:Coolgamer|Coolgamer]] 11:20, February 20, 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 12:20, February 20, 2007

ummmm we already have an article like this. see NARV --Rylasasin 19:10, February 3, 2007 (CST)


Sorry. Should it be left for deletion or should it just make reference to the NARV article?

yeah why nto make it refrence to the NARV article.--Rylasasin 19:47, February 3, 2007 (CST)

Guilty

I'm guilty of this one. I tend to find things either really funny or piss-poor, although I have given credit for graphic work and effort. Is there a system to help "rehabilitate" my voting pattern? Coolgamer 11:20, February 20, 2007 (CST)