Difference between revisions of "Joke"

From YTMND
Jump to: navigation, search
(this isn't NEDM ... check minus.)
m (Reverted edits by NEDMInspector30732767 (Contribs | Talk | Block); changed back to last version by [[User:Westing1992|Westing1992)
Line 1: Line 1:
this isn't NEDM ... check minus.
+
{{Fad Infobox|name
 +
|img
 +
|original=marc
 +
|originalTitle=A Detailed Analysis of Prop. 23
 +
|orcreator=lacrossestar83
 +
|ordate=October 2, 2009
 +
|ordatecat=October 2009
 +
|spinoff1=hue
 +
|title1=lacrossestar83 makes a site
 +
|spinoff2=Idrewit
 +
|title2=Draw Poland Day
 +
|spinoff3=sydbarrettjoke
 +
|title3=syd barrett joke
 +
|spinoff4=clevelandisrioting
 +
|title4=CLEVELAND IS RIOTING!!!
 +
|spinoff5=libertarian
 +
|title5=libertarian.ytmnd.com
 +
}}
 +
 
 +
The '''Joke''' fad is a [[Forced_fad]] by {{ytmnduser|lacrossestar83}}. The first site was made on October 2nd, 2009 and featured a deceptive title, a flashing image of the word "joke", and [[Ear_rape]]. This noise is composed of a [[Marv]] scream, a [[Most_Annoying_Sound_In_The_World]] scream, and various waveforms.
 +
 
 +
The fad has been repeated a couple hundred times with only slight variations in the audio. These sites generally receive low ratings, but there is a high degree of variability. For the exact same site, the rating might be anything from a low of a mid-1.0 to a high of a low-4.0.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Noise fads]]
 +
[[Category:Trolling]]

Revision as of 08:49, April 15, 2012

Joke
Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination
Original YTMND:
A Detailed Analysis of Prop. 23  
by lacrossestar83 
October 2, 2009  
Worthy spinoffs:

The Joke fad is a Forced_fad by lacrossestar83. The first site was made on October 2nd, 2009 and featured a deceptive title, a flashing image of the word "joke", and Ear_rape. This noise is composed of a Marv scream, a Most_Annoying_Sound_In_The_World scream, and various waveforms.

The fad has been repeated a couple hundred times with only slight variations in the audio. These sites generally receive low ratings, but there is a high degree of variability. For the exact same site, the rating might be anything from a low of a mid-1.0 to a high of a low-4.0.