Difference between revisions of "YTMND talk:Proposed Rules"

From YTMND
Jump to: navigation, search
(Meta Data)
(Meta Data)
Line 34: Line 34:
 
The punishments for improper citation might be lowered, but the emphasis is still put on crediting your sources. [[User:BTape|BTape]] 03:34, January 15, 2008 (CST)<br>
 
The punishments for improper citation might be lowered, but the emphasis is still put on crediting your sources. [[User:BTape|BTape]] 03:34, January 15, 2008 (CST)<br>
 
Well that just blows. If I take from 20 different sources, do I have to credit all of them? This is YTMND, not shitty fucking Wikipedia. --[[User:RySenkari|RySenkari]]
 
Well that just blows. If I take from 20 different sources, do I have to credit all of them? This is YTMND, not shitty fucking Wikipedia. --[[User:RySenkari|RySenkari]]
 +
 +
Oh god, will you shut up?  This is ytmnd, not the threat of nuclear war. --[[User:Kassius|Kassius]] 17:03, January 15, 2008 (CST)
  
 
=Just generally being a dumb idiot=
 
=Just generally being a dumb idiot=
 
=Trying not to get caught=
 
=Trying not to get caught=
 
=Miscellaneous=
 
=Miscellaneous=

Revision as of 17:03, January 15, 2008

Discuss the rules or suggest your own.

Spamming

Define real effort. --RySenkari
I think it means "not sticking random images with random sounds." Classic style sites get a little bit of a pass in that way, because the image and sound often go together in an important way to make a joke. Taking images/sounds from the internet and uploading them to YTMND without reasonable modification would break that rule. BTape 03:34, January 15, 2008 (CST)

Obscenity, Racism, Harassment, and shock value

Define unnecessary amount. --RySenkari
This one is up to a moderator's judgment, unless a consensus can be reached on a boundary. BTape 03:34, January 15, 2008 (CST)

General use of pornography

Creating to or linking sites or comments glorifying generally illegal actions

Voting Trends

Telling people how to vote is retarded, but whatever. --RySenkari
While some of the rules that fall under voting trends may be difficult to enforce, such as "revenge voting," I think there do need to be limits on the abusive voting habits that plague the site. BTape 03:34, January 15, 2008 (CST)
So upvoting is banned? Even if there's a good reason? I only click on a site if I'm pretty sure I'm gonna like it, that's why most of my votes are 5s. You want me to deliberately try to view shitty sites? --RySenkari

Grouping up to push an agenda

User Moderation Abuse

Does incorrectly mean blatantly labeling an NSFW site of yours SFW, or does it also extend to being wrong about a borderline site? --RySenkari
The punishments outlined currently are probably too harsh, but that can be changed. Yes, incorrectly marking a "borderline site" would fall under this rule. The planned moderation system may or may not have the same NSFW strictness it has now, though. BTape 03:34, January 15, 2008 (CST)
Forcing people to make difficult judgment calls at the risk of being banned = bad. It makes YTMND less fun. --RySenkari

Use of alternate accounts

Meta Data

Oh God I'm fucked. --Kassius 06:46, January 14, 2008 (CST)
All kinds of crazy, stupid shit here. This will kill a lot of good sites if you do this. --RySenkari
The punishments for improper citation might be lowered, but the emphasis is still put on crediting your sources. BTape 03:34, January 15, 2008 (CST)
Well that just blows. If I take from 20 different sources, do I have to credit all of them? This is YTMND, not shitty fucking Wikipedia. --RySenkari

Oh god, will you shut up? This is ytmnd, not the threat of nuclear war. --Kassius 17:03, January 15, 2008 (CST)

Just generally being a dumb idiot

Trying not to get caught

Miscellaneous