Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rickroll"
From YTMND
m |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Due to its nature, would Rickroll be considered an Interruption Fad? This may be a unique situation as in most sites, the "interruption" happens instantly. [[User:KKyuubi|KKyuubi]] 21:28, July 5, 2007 (CDT) | Due to its nature, would Rickroll be considered an Interruption Fad? This may be a unique situation as in most sites, the "interruption" happens instantly. [[User:KKyuubi|KKyuubi]] 21:28, July 5, 2007 (CDT) | ||
:I agree. The first type of Rickroll sites described could be considered an interruption fad, while the second type is simply a generic combination of other fads with the song. [[User:BTape|BTape]] 21:33, July 5, 2007 (CDT) | :I agree. The first type of Rickroll sites described could be considered an interruption fad, while the second type is simply a generic combination of other fads with the song. [[User:BTape|BTape]] 21:33, July 5, 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4chan crap should stay on 4chan.--[[User:Centralbandit|Centralbandit]] 22:28, July 5, 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:28, July 5, 2007
Interruption?
Due to its nature, would Rickroll be considered an Interruption Fad? This may be a unique situation as in most sites, the "interruption" happens instantly. KKyuubi 21:28, July 5, 2007 (CDT)
- I agree. The first type of Rickroll sites described could be considered an interruption fad, while the second type is simply a generic combination of other fads with the song. BTape 21:33, July 5, 2007 (CDT)
4chan crap should stay on 4chan.--Centralbandit 22:28, July 5, 2007 (CDT)
