|
|
| (11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Dude, why not [[Awesome God]]? Is there a rule against articles on the songs? I know I seen it in more than just the Jesus fads!! //// Pacific PanDeist 14:30, October 5, 2006 (CDT)
| + | Cleaning up my talk page...my reason here is just to update info bout ytmnd. Board 8 from gamefaqs can suck my ass. [[User:Maplejet|Maplejet]] 07:00, January 26, 2007 (CST) |
| | | | |
| − | :You'll have to take a look at it yourself. Use the talk page for the site. Most of the info for Awesome God is already listed in Jesus itself, making it quite useless. Others like that Secret Nazi fad have been involved in other fads as subject of misinterpretation. Daft Punk has their own page because numerous songs by them have been fadded to death. [[User:Maplejet|Maplejet]] 17:32, October 5, 2006 (CDT)
| + | Usually the point of a "user talk" page is to discuss the user who's page is the focal point in discussion. It's erroneous to delete opinions that you don't like, because it's not your right. This particular page is a discussion, it's not "your page" But in traditional maplejet fashion, you deal with your problems by not facing them, deleting them, or running away. I mean, how many times have you threatened me already without doing anything to follow up. "Wahwahwah I'm gonna get you banned. blah blah blah." You've got to eventually take a long hard look at yourself and realize how much of a faggot you're being. --[[User:Kassius|Kassius]] 08:25, January 26, 2007 (CST) |
| − | ::Nah, dude, the song is in over 1,000 YTMNDs, some with no Jesus ''and'' it's on the [[YTMND Soundtrack]], so it should get a page all its own. Are these only discussed on talk pages? //// Pacific PanDeist 19:20, October 5, 2006 (CDT)
| + | |
| − | :::Meh, ask other users for their opinions. We'll take what that majority says. [[User:Maplejet|Maplejet]] 05:04, October 6, 2006 (CDT)
| + | |
| | | | |
| − | Maplejet lives on the wiki :P --[[User:MarcusTheMartin|MarcusTheMartin]] 07:45, October 10, 2006 (CDT)
| |
| − | :Damn right I do. It's my life...that is when I'm not doing any duties.[[User:Maplejet|Maplejet]] 10:00, October 10, 2006 (CDT)
| |
| | | | |
| − | Uh, dude, I checked the user list and there don't seem to ''be'' any sysops (or bureaucrats) on this here wiki.... so what do we do about that? I guess if anyone should be a sysop here you should.... //// Pacific PanDeist 21:20, October 15, 2006 (CDT)
| + | --Oh man, that's awesome! I wish I'd have seen this earlier! [[User:Lacrossestar83|Lacrossestar83]] 17:11, December 21, 2012 (CST) |
| − | | + | |
| − | :Um...whatever. I'm just fighting off NARVs, specifically those that think 15 myspace suicide sites for Terell Owens and 20 Weakeness/lol stingray sites are necessary for Steve Irwin's death.[[User:Maplejet|Maplejet]] 08:29, October 16, 2006 (CDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ::I was wrong anyway, the user list just doesn't show who are sysops like it should.... but there are some. //// Pacific PanDeist 09:32, October 16, 2006 (CDT)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | hey find the guy who edited the NEDM pages IP so i can fuck w/ him. make him pay. also revert changes by him (aka Nedm Patrol)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Pinerocket ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Sooo, is this guy your alt-account or what? It just dosent seem possible that someone could hate you THAT much! --[[User:Giggity Giggity|Giggity Giggity]] 14:35, November 18, 2006 (CST)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | :Sign your post next time damnit so I know who it is. Anyways, it's definitely a joke account of someone...possibly associated with the YFP army since I'm not a fan of their sites even though I share their beliefs vs. NARVS. [[User:Maplejet|Maplejet]] 22:52, November 17, 2006 (CST)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ::Whats the YFP Army? --[[User:Giggity Giggity|Giggity Giggity]] 14:35, November 18, 2006 (CST)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | :::YFP Army = You Forgot Poland Army. A group of users who try to clense ytmnd of NARVs, but by use of ear-rape and very noisy/seizuris sites. They force their own fads which are bad on purpose. If anything, their sites are just influencing others to continue on with dumb fads like epic manuevers and emo. [[User:Maplejet|Maplejet]] 23:00, November 18, 2006 (CST)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ::::That's not really fair. We don't find our creations to be purposely bad, it's just a different form of expression. We don't think that YTMND should be sunshine and puppies all the time, and it's a different style of humor that we appreciate. It's not about polluting the site, it's about doing something a little different from the mainstream. The "purposely bad" sites we make often take more time than the original site that is being transformed. You don't have to like the sites, but I think you should take another look at them and try to find what about it we find to be of quality. On another note, we're not really sure who Pinerocket is, but we think the sites are chuckle-worthy. Surely no offense is intended. [[User:Doomrock|Doomrock]] 20:19, November 28, 2006 (CST)
| + | |
| − | :::::I understand that...if you look closely at my voting record though, I have not 1'd every single Poland site...I gave the mod fave a 4 back in 2004 and still today. I'm just not really a fan of most ear-rape sites though. The Pinerocket thing is either a joke account by a crazy member like Darth Wang or Kassius...or it could be a joke account from a user on my home board getting help from some members. If it is the latter who's been a douche lately on that board, I'll curbstomp him to hell.[[User:Maplejet|Maplejet]] 23:05, November 28, 2006 (CST)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == You have hypocrisy on your page! ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | "What I despise though are the rebels who constantly 1 sites for their own beliefs and hopes that they can take over ytmnd." Isn't that what YOU do to the FPA? You purposefully seek us out... like many have told you before, if you don't like us, leave us be. We're working toward the same goal, but we MAKE SITES... You, unfortch, don't do anything creative besides find another way to say "Simple Plan sucks". At least we do something to try to make the community better. I guess we just have VERY different sense of humor. I mean if someone (and please, no one bother because I said it first) made a ChandlerHeather alt and used it to poke fun at me, I would laugh my ass off! Methinks you take YTMND waaaaay too seriously, bro. Anyway I thought I'd let you know about this error in case you want to correct it... [[User:HeatherChandler|HeatherChandler]] 14:24, December 11, 2006 (CST)
| + | |
| − | :Eh, I'm one of those users who usually have rage attacks. If you looked closely, I think I've 3'd or 4'd a KHANTMND site I felt was under-rated. And I seriously suspect that Pinerocket to be an account of a friend I know who's been acting like a douche on his board. I'm just not a fan of the ear-rape...and the epic manuevers, and pedo town, and overused fad music...and...15:50, December 11, 2006 (CST)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | I had Bill Nye the Science Guy in mine, if you listened to it there was minimal ear rape and it took QUITE a lot of effort on my part. I also hate Pedotown... I mean seriously, it's illegal because it is WRONNNNNNNNG. [[User:HeatherChandler|HeatherChandler]] 17:47, December 11, 2006 (CST)
| + | |
Cleaning up my talk page...my reason here is just to update info bout ytmnd. Board 8 from gamefaqs can suck my ass. Maplejet 07:00, January 26, 2007 (CST)
Usually the point of a "user talk" page is to discuss the user who's page is the focal point in discussion. It's erroneous to delete opinions that you don't like, because it's not your right. This particular page is a discussion, it's not "your page" But in traditional maplejet fashion, you deal with your problems by not facing them, deleting them, or running away. I mean, how many times have you threatened me already without doing anything to follow up. "Wahwahwah I'm gonna get you banned. blah blah blah." You've got to eventually take a long hard look at yourself and realize how much of a faggot you're being. --Kassius 08:25, January 26, 2007 (CST)
