Difference between revisions of "Talk:30,000 Votes Accumulated Club"
From YTMND
(→Consider making "Noteworthy Users" page and merging with this article) |
(→Consider making "Noteworthy Users" page and merging with this article) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Could be useful. What sort of requirements were you thinking of to be considered a noteworthy user? [[User:Ochobobo|Ochobobo]] 20:29, April 20, 2007 (CDT) | :Could be useful. What sort of requirements were you thinking of to be considered a noteworthy user? [[User:Ochobobo|Ochobobo]] 20:29, April 20, 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | what are you talking about Ochonono, all these technical words. b -a2 | ||
Revision as of 22:59, April 20, 2007
And yet everyone wrote off adverb for all he has done for the site. You should be ashamed. --Centralbandit 21:04, February 4, 2007 (CST)
Just realized I would have to make about 65 more sites to get on this list, assuming they all get at least 300 votes. Ochobobo 21:28, February 13, 2007 (CST)
Consider making "Noteworthy Users" page and merging with this article
I think this article could be much better improved by being changed to a piece about noteworthy users with various stats including votes accumulated, most popular sites, etc. BTape 19:57, April 20, 2007 (CDT)
- Could be useful. What sort of requirements were you thinking of to be considered a noteworthy user? Ochobobo 20:29, April 20, 2007 (CDT)
what are you talking about Ochonono, all these technical words. b -a2
