Difference between revisions of "Talk:Comparison of fad remakes"

From YTMND
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 19: Line 19:
 
To be honest, if it really was that bad, they wouldn't have any alternate universe counterparts. And all of these seem to have Good Ratinges  (Except the killed ones, we need to remove them) [[User:Gerkuman|Gerkuman]] 13:14, September 6, 2006 (CDT)
 
To be honest, if it really was that bad, they wouldn't have any alternate universe counterparts. And all of these seem to have Good Ratinges  (Except the killed ones, we need to remove them) [[User:Gerkuman|Gerkuman]] 13:14, September 6, 2006 (CDT)
  
−
I strongly agree with you. This is the #1 article where self-promoting bottom-feeders feed off of the most with their lame {{**}} sites, which is a violation of YTMND Wiki Rule #4. Nothing justifies self promoting. Not even PTKFGS, YESYES, or some 4th corner (NEDM sux). In addition, many sites (even some good ones) in this list have been deleted or killed. There needs to be a rule on this article about the site having a certain amount of views and/or a good rating. -Bruno
+
== Cleanup ==
 +
This article is a serious mess. Many sites that are linked in this article have been killed or deleted. And there are many poorly made {{**}} sites here that were posted by their creators who think that just because they made some PTKFGS, YESYES, YHTMOAG, HEH, etc. fad remake, they can post it on this article. That is a violation of Wiki Rule #4. There should be some rule in this article that if you are going to post a site, it should have a good rating and/or view count. To summarize: we need to remove those deleted, killed, and self sponsored sites.
 +
-Bruno

Revision as of 19:05, October 21, 2006

The List of PTKFGS variations has a list of many alternate universe fads, but only on PTKFGS. This article, isn't that long, but it covers YesYes and fourth universe, too. And the PTKFGS list is WAY too messy. --It's Smiddle, LOL. 17:09, 4 June 2006 (CDT)

They should all be merged into the fad remakes page (this one). kthxbi -Mysekurity | O RLY? 18:40, 4 June 2006 (CDT)
k --It's Smiddle, LOL. 06:36, 5 June 2006 (CDT)

Cleanup

Could PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZ someone more than me try to clean this shit up!? kthxbi --It's Smiddle, LOL | I believe you have my Talk Page? 15:04, June 11, 2006 (CDT)

GAYTMND?

Should GAYTMND be added to this? It does have some fad remakes. -Bruno

GAYTMND isn't really a alternate universe so says MasterSitsu. -HallwayGiant 19:34, August 10, 2006 (CDT)
I know. But lots of people make fad remakes.

Featured Article?

this is probably the most poorly kept site on the wiki. about half the list is trash posted by their creators. are there any requirements (votes/views/ratings) to get on this list? --Dyskrasia 14:34, August 13, 2006 (CDT)

To be honest, if it really was that bad, they wouldn't have any alternate universe counterparts. And all of these seem to have Good Ratinges (Except the killed ones, we need to remove them) Gerkuman 13:14, September 6, 2006 (CDT)

Cleanup

This article is a serious mess. Many sites that are linked in this article have been killed or deleted. And there are many poorly made ** sites here that were posted by their creators who think that just because they made some PTKFGS, YESYES, YHTMOAG, HEH, etc. fad remake, they can post it on this article. That is a violation of Wiki Rule #4. There should be some rule in this article that if you are going to post a site, it should have a good rating and/or view count. To summarize: we need to remove those deleted, killed, and self sponsored sites. -Bruno

Retrieved from "https://wiki.ytmnd.com/index.php?title=Talk:Comparison_of_fad_remakes&oldid=22988"