Difference between revisions of "YTMND talk:Definition of a fad"
From YTMND
(→The purpose of this page) |
Messedrocker (Talk | contribs) (i agree with max) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==The purpose of this page== | ==The purpose of this page== | ||
The reason why I'd like to know what a fad specifically is is because there is none — technically, anything with enough search results qualifies as a fad. As a result, there are about fifty seven billion fads, some more faddy than the other. There are some that are undeniably fads, and those that are questionably fads. This is confusing. Using this discussion page, I'd like to come up with the single definition of a YTMND fad. Please list your ideas below (and sign each of your comments by typing "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>" without the quotes). [[User:Messedrocker|Messedrocker]] 01:36, July 22, 2006 (CDT) | The reason why I'd like to know what a fad specifically is is because there is none — technically, anything with enough search results qualifies as a fad. As a result, there are about fifty seven billion fads, some more faddy than the other. There are some that are undeniably fads, and those that are questionably fads. This is confusing. Using this discussion page, I'd like to come up with the single definition of a YTMND fad. Please list your ideas below (and sign each of your comments by typing "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>" without the quotes). [[User:Messedrocker|Messedrocker]] 01:36, July 22, 2006 (CDT) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Reparodied many times== | ==Reparodied many times== | ||
When it's reparodied many times, I see it as a fad. <small>[[User:Smiddle|It's Smiddle, LOL]] | [[User talk:Smiddle/userpage|What is Talk Page?]]</small> 01:58, July 22, 2006 (CDT) | When it's reparodied many times, I see it as a fad. <small>[[User:Smiddle|It's Smiddle, LOL]] | [[User talk:Smiddle/userpage|What is Talk Page?]]</small> 01:58, July 22, 2006 (CDT) | ||
: Well, that's a given. I believe that when the final definition is laid out, that should be like the preamble or something. What I'm looking for is specific figures. [[User:Messedrocker|Messedrocker]] 02:15, July 22, 2006 (CDT) | : Well, that's a given. I believe that when the final definition is laid out, that should be like the preamble or something. What I'm looking for is specific figures. [[User:Messedrocker|Messedrocker]] 02:15, July 22, 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Repeated ad nauseum== | ||
| + | I'd say a fad is something that used to be funny but has been repeated so many times that it now boils your blood to even think about it, let alone see it. [[User:Max|Max]] 19:58, July 22, 2006 (CDT) | ||
| + | : That's actually something that could be added to the definition: "YTMNDs incorporating basic elements of a fad are bound to attract at least a small level of criticism for including the fad." [[User:Messedrocker|Messedrocker]] 20:01, July 22, 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:01, July 22, 2006
The purpose of this page
The reason why I'd like to know what a fad specifically is is because there is none — technically, anything with enough search results qualifies as a fad. As a result, there are about fifty seven billion fads, some more faddy than the other. There are some that are undeniably fads, and those that are questionably fads. This is confusing. Using this discussion page, I'd like to come up with the single definition of a YTMND fad. Please list your ideas below (and sign each of your comments by typing "~~~~" without the quotes). Messedrocker 01:36, July 22, 2006 (CDT)
Reparodied many times
When it's reparodied many times, I see it as a fad. It's Smiddle, LOL | What is Talk Page? 01:58, July 22, 2006 (CDT)
- Well, that's a given. I believe that when the final definition is laid out, that should be like the preamble or something. What I'm looking for is specific figures. Messedrocker 02:15, July 22, 2006 (CDT)
Repeated ad nauseum
I'd say a fad is something that used to be funny but has been repeated so many times that it now boils your blood to even think about it, let alone see it. Max 19:58, July 22, 2006 (CDT)
- That's actually something that could be added to the definition: "YTMNDs incorporating basic elements of a fad are bound to attract at least a small level of criticism for including the fad." Messedrocker 20:01, July 22, 2006 (CDT)
