Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dctownes"
m |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
your DcTMNDs (dancing celebrity (coincidence? (parenthesis within parenthesis))) have had more votes and views than 90% of the so-called fads listed on this wiki. and that doesn't even take into account the spinoff sites by other users. am i saying that the wiki should dedicate pages to the exploits of one man (god (man-god))? no. i just find it absurd that we make pages for flash-in-the-pan fads just because they have multiple contributors, when one user can completely and utterly eclipse the work of many. | your DcTMNDs (dancing celebrity (coincidence? (parenthesis within parenthesis))) have had more votes and views than 90% of the so-called fads listed on this wiki. and that doesn't even take into account the spinoff sites by other users. am i saying that the wiki should dedicate pages to the exploits of one man (god (man-god))? no. i just find it absurd that we make pages for flash-in-the-pan fads just because they have multiple contributors, when one user can completely and utterly eclipse the work of many. | ||
| + | ps make sites | ||
Latest revision as of 16:16, August 16, 2007
what magazine you work for homie?--Moheevi 16:44, November 16, 2006 (CST)
Blender magazine... look for it on your local newsstands!
Why are people going crazy with editing thier names on Dctownes name? --- Connor 09:23, May 17, 2007 (CDT)
people so crazy!
your DcTMNDs (dancing celebrity (coincidence? (parenthesis within parenthesis))) have had more votes and views than 90% of the so-called fads listed on this wiki. and that doesn't even take into account the spinoff sites by other users. am i saying that the wiki should dedicate pages to the exploits of one man (god (man-god))? no. i just find it absurd that we make pages for flash-in-the-pan fads just because they have multiple contributors, when one user can completely and utterly eclipse the work of many. ps make sites
