Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Interruptors"
From YTMND
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Are you sure? Take [http://c64staresintoyour.ytmnd.com/ this] and [http://baboongone.ytmnd.com/ this] for examples. You sure they don't interrupt? They come up unexpected with a surprise similar to NEDM's. [[User:Stmp|Stmp]] 16:46, October 2, 2007 (CDT) | Are you sure? Take [http://c64staresintoyour.ytmnd.com/ this] and [http://baboongone.ytmnd.com/ this] for examples. You sure they don't interrupt? They come up unexpected with a surprise similar to NEDM's. [[User:Stmp|Stmp]] 16:46, October 2, 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | even though there may be some interrupting sites with fuckfish, i think the spirit of fuckfish is randomness not interruption. -- [[User:Mikeycomicsinc|Mikeycomicsinc]] 21:04, October 2, 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | mikey is right. most fuckfish sites don't involve any kind of interruption, even though some do use it that way. [[User:BTape|BTape]] 23:07, October 2, 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ah, okay. [[User:Stmp|Stmp]] 05:13, October 3, 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 05:13, October 3, 2007
""FuckFish" isn't anything like an interruptor." -BTape, quote from history of template.
Are you sure? Take this and this for examples. You sure they don't interrupt? They come up unexpected with a surprise similar to NEDM's. Stmp 16:46, October 2, 2007 (CDT)
even though there may be some interrupting sites with fuckfish, i think the spirit of fuckfish is randomness not interruption. -- Mikeycomicsinc 21:04, October 2, 2007 (CDT)
mikey is right. most fuckfish sites don't involve any kind of interruption, even though some do use it that way. BTape 23:07, October 2, 2007 (CDT)
Ah, okay. Stmp 05:13, October 3, 2007 (CDT)
