Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rickroll"

From YTMND
Jump to: navigation, search
 
m
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Due to its nature, would Rickroll be considered an Interruption Fad? This may be a unique situation as in most sites, the "interruption" happens instantly. [[User:KKyuubi|KKyuubi]] 21:28, July 5, 2007 (CDT)
 
Due to its nature, would Rickroll be considered an Interruption Fad? This may be a unique situation as in most sites, the "interruption" happens instantly. [[User:KKyuubi|KKyuubi]] 21:28, July 5, 2007 (CDT)
 +
:I agree. The first type of Rickroll sites described could be considered an interruption fad, while the second type is simply a generic combination of other fads with the song. [[User:BTape|BTape]] 21:33, July 5, 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:33, July 5, 2007

Interruption?

Due to its nature, would Rickroll be considered an Interruption Fad? This may be a unique situation as in most sites, the "interruption" happens instantly. KKyuubi 21:28, July 5, 2007 (CDT)

I agree. The first type of Rickroll sites described could be considered an interruption fad, while the second type is simply a generic combination of other fads with the song. BTape 21:33, July 5, 2007 (CDT)