Difference between revisions of "Talk:Outrageous"
From YTMND
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Should be merged with 'Jem' | + | Should be merged with '[[Jem]]' |
Also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20BZID081Vk | Also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20BZID081Vk | ||
This link shoud explain a lot. | This link shoud explain a lot. | ||
| + | --Artman40 13:22, March 20, 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Not necessarily gay. It's more about ''glamour and glitter'', ''fashion and fame''. | ||
| + | <br>--richards6 14:03(PST), 2006 Mar 20 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Righto, richards. Those things aren't the least bit gay. | ||
| + | <br>--Necronomicon 18:03(CDT), March 20 2007 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Maybe gay in its old meaning perhaps? | ||
| + | <br>--Artman40 16:49, March 20, 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 16:49, March 20, 2007
Should be merged with 'Jem' Also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20BZID081Vk This link shoud explain a lot. --Artman40 13:22, March 20, 2007 (CDT)
Not necessarily gay. It's more about glamour and glitter, fashion and fame.
--richards6 14:03(PST), 2006 Mar 20
Righto, richards. Those things aren't the least bit gay.
--Necronomicon 18:03(CDT), March 20 2007
Maybe gay in its old meaning perhaps?
--Artman40 16:49, March 20, 2007 (CDT)
