Difference between revisions of "Talk:Michael Richards"
From YTMND
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Does anybody think that the "worthy spinoffs" section should be updated? Many of the most memorable sites aren't as recognized as they should be, in particular, Kramer Rap 3.0. | Does anybody think that the "worthy spinoffs" section should be updated? Many of the most memorable sites aren't as recognized as they should be, in particular, Kramer Rap 3.0. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I just placed the first 5 popular Kramer sites there. The fad was new. As for any fads, they should be updated. [[User:Maplejet|Maplejet]] 22:31, November 23, 2006 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 23:31, November 23, 2006
Does anybody think that the "worthy spinoffs" section should be updated? Many of the most memorable sites aren't as recognized as they should be, in particular, Kramer Rap 3.0.
- I just placed the first 5 popular Kramer sites there. The fad was new. As for any fads, they should be updated. Maplejet 22:31, November 23, 2006 (CST)
