Difference between revisions of "Talk:09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0"
m (→Delete this Article) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Very well then, I understand completly. Thanks for the warning too. Sorry about that.[[User:ShadowSTL|ShadowSTL]] 11:47, May 4, 2007 (CDT) | Very well then, I understand completly. Thanks for the warning too. Sorry about that.[[User:ShadowSTL|ShadowSTL]] 11:47, May 4, 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I still maintain that this entire deal is a digg event. The few sites posted here that "did well" were only getting such high views due to being posted on digg! Maybe if the big HD-DVD riot happened on YTMND it would be worth the wiki article, but two sites got posted here, one got sponsored, both got dugg, and now it's an article here? I'll respect your decision enough to not mess with the article, though. [[User:BTape|BTape]] 13:06, May 4, 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:06, May 4, 2007
use the talk page if you want to consider articles for deletion, retard.
Delete this Article
This page is not really notable at all. Its more about Digg anyway like what BTape said.ShadowSTL 21:37, May 3, 2007 (CDT)
Page stays. Site was notable and it did start a mini fad. Any blanking out of this page will result in a ban. -- fyrestorm 11:25, May 4, 2007 (CDT)
Very well then, I understand completly. Thanks for the warning too. Sorry about that.ShadowSTL 11:47, May 4, 2007 (CDT)
I still maintain that this entire deal is a digg event. The few sites posted here that "did well" were only getting such high views due to being posted on digg! Maybe if the big HD-DVD riot happened on YTMND it would be worth the wiki article, but two sites got posted here, one got sponsored, both got dugg, and now it's an article here? I'll respect your decision enough to not mess with the article, though. BTape 13:06, May 4, 2007 (CDT)
