Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rickroll"
From YTMND
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
4chan crap should stay on 4chan.--[[User:Centralbandit|Centralbandit]] 22:28, July 5, 2007 (CDT) | 4chan crap should stay on 4chan.--[[User:Centralbandit|Centralbandit]] 22:28, July 5, 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | :This fad is now a popular part of YTMND. It is definitely noteworthy on the YTMND wiki. [[User:BTape|BTape]] 22:43, July 5, 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I wasn't dissing the wiki article. I'm saying in general "lol this was on 4chan, I bet I would become popular on ytmnd" garbage needs to stop. As this should be applied to other web content, such as youtube, etc.--[[User:Centralbandit|Centralbandit]] 23:09, July 5, 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 22:09, July 5, 2007
Interruption?
Due to its nature, would Rickroll be considered an Interruption Fad? This may be a unique situation as in most sites, the "interruption" happens instantly. KKyuubi 21:28, July 5, 2007 (CDT)
- I agree. The first type of Rickroll sites described could be considered an interruption fad, while the second type is simply a generic combination of other fads with the song. BTape 21:33, July 5, 2007 (CDT)
4chan crap should stay on 4chan.--Centralbandit 22:28, July 5, 2007 (CDT)
- This fad is now a popular part of YTMND. It is definitely noteworthy on the YTMND wiki. BTape 22:43, July 5, 2007 (CDT)
I wasn't dissing the wiki article. I'm saying in general "lol this was on 4chan, I bet I would become popular on ytmnd" garbage needs to stop. As this should be applied to other web content, such as youtube, etc.--Centralbandit 23:09, July 5, 2007 (CDT)
